In the eyes of many people, headhunting is to dig the corner, but don't underestimate it. To a certain extent, digging the corner is good for professionals. Moreover, enterprises are more likely to raise wages and improve the working environment, so as to prevent the remaining employees from being poached in the future. Some people will say, what if the poacher divulges the company's secrets

从人才江南娱乐官方网 行业上说这涉及到被挖走的员工的道德问题?通常，当人们考虑挖墙脚的道德问题时，他们考虑的是挖人的公司的举动：对外部企业来说发现、征集和雇用并非正在寻找工作的员工的行为是否可以接受?在论文中，我们认为只要雇用的原因不涉及任何的阴谋，就是符合道德的。联系有工作的人并 向他们提供更好的机会没有什么不合适的。

From the perspective of the talent headhunting service industry, it involves the moral problems of the employees who have been poached. Usually, when people think about the moral problems of poaching, they think about the actions of the poaching company: is it acceptable for external enterprises to find, solicit and employ employees who are not looking for jobs? In this paper, we think that as long as the reasons for employment do not involve any factors It is in line with morality. There's nothing wrong with contacting people with jobs and offering them better opportunities.

相反，被挖的员工的行为必须要进行是否道德的评判。如果员工为了更高的工资和更好的福利以及更好的机会而离开现在的公司也很少被认为是不道德。几乎所有的雇员都是自愿收到雇用——美国的雇主要求他们签署认知书明确他们可以选择放弃或者因为任何原因而离开。除非雇主和雇员曾经共同做出忠诚的承诺，否则员工可以不带有任何伦理担忧的离职。如果是在一家小企业里，公司业主和员工对未来做出过坚定的承诺则是另外一种很罕见的例外情况。

On the contrary, the behavior of the employees must be judged morally. If employees leave the company for higher wages, better benefits and better opportunities, it is rarely considered immoral. Almost all employees are voluntarily hired - employers in the United States ask them to sign a letter of understanding that they can choose to give up or leave for any reason. Unless employers and employees have made a commitment of loyalty, employees can leave without any ethical concerns. If it is in a small business, the company owners and employees have made a firm commitment to the future is another rare exception.